For the Health of the Nation
Most times in my posts I attempt to take a pot-shot at Evangelical(ism) in our country. Many times I wonder like Ted Haggard if we really are christians at all. However, I would like to say that I read something that I kinda like. The National Association of Evangelicals has published For the Health of the Nation, a call to civic and social responsibility.
Interesting to me is the realization that Evangelicals come from a variety of religious perspectives and are not all completely on-board with Right-Wing policy. Alex Johnson covers the NAE's public statment in his article, Evangelicals rething their public face.
I don't personally endorse the NAE or all the leaders and ministries represented, I just think that this deal is a good step. What do you think?
Not that I think that a declaration with a lot of leaders names on it can actually start anything...oh...what a minute, maybe it could.
Interesting to me is the realization that Evangelicals come from a variety of religious perspectives and are not all completely on-board with Right-Wing policy. Alex Johnson covers the NAE's public statment in his article, Evangelicals rething their public face.
Although evangelical leaders have been among the most prominent spokesmen for conservative causes, “evangelical” and “religious right” are not the same thing. Studies indicate that as many as 40 percent of Americans who call themselves evangelicals are politically moderate or identify with the Democratic Party.
I don't personally endorse the NAE or all the leaders and ministries represented, I just think that this deal is a good step. What do you think?
Not that I think that a declaration with a lot of leaders names on it can actually start anything...oh...what a minute, maybe it could.
Forerunners of the Future




